UPPER LIMB AMPUTATION-ELBOW DISARTICULATION

From NeuroRehab.wiki

Revision as of 09:56, 25 July 2023 by Dr Appukutty Manickam (talk | contribs) (Imported from text file)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

SUMMARY

PROS
1. The surgical technique permits reduction in surgery time and blood loss.
2. Provides improved prosthetic self-suspension (by permitting the use of a less encumbering socket).
3. Reduces the rotation of the socket on the residual limb compared with a transhumeral level of amputation.
4. Allows greater lifting, pulling, and pushing power compared to above-elbow amputation.

CONS
1. Marginal cosmetic appearance caused by the necessary external elbow mechanism.
2. Current limitations in technology that impede the use of externally powered elbow mechanisms at this level of amputation.


Reference(s)

Cifu, D.X. (2020). Braddom’s physical medicine and rehabilitation. Elsevier. Get it on Amazon.
Cuccurullo, S. (2019). Physical medicine and rehabilitation board review. New York: Demosmedical. Get it on Amazon.
O’Young, B., Young, M.A. and Stiens, S.A. (2008). Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Secrets. Mosby. Get it on Amazon.